Categories
Messages

Tozer Talks

Tozer Talks · Living A Life That Befits Sound Doctrine

Living A Life That Befits Sound Doctrine

Pastor and author A.W. Tozer

March 30, 1958

To Paul, sound teaching had two parts, foundation and superstructure, or otherwise, the root and tree with its fruit. And he said one became the other, that is, one was inextricably tied up with the other, one was the effect of the cause, the other was the cause, one was the foundation, the other the building, one was the root, the other the fruit and the tree. And he couldn’t think of these apart, and he wouldn’t.

He said, now, there in Crete, that miserable place, you notice how often, and just in the passage I read briefly and imperfectly here, you notice how often he said, be sober. They were a Hollywood bunch, evidently, and sobriety, both in temperament and in practice, didn’t seem to be their characteristics. So, he said, he warned them sharply that they were to be so.

Now, I want you to note here that to Paul, salvation in Jesus Christ carried with it beliefs about certain things, and practice in harmony with those beliefs. Now, Paul knew nothing else but that. That was Paul.

If you want to teach Paul, then you can’t separate certain parts of Ephesians and say, this is Pauline theology. Pauline theology had two sides to it, as I’ve explained. The one side was the theology of belief, and the other was the morality that results from the theology. The one side was the right belief, and the other side was the right living. One side we call the foundation, the other the building.

Or changing it around to Paul, Christian belief, Christian doctrine, sound doctrine consisted of the root and the tree, which grew up out of the root, along with the fruit of the tree. That is, again, we have it, the root was the theology, what you believe about God and Christ. And the tree was the morality, and the fruit was the right living.

So, we have theology and morality, right belief and right living, all bound together, and they can’t be taken apart. Strange that we’ve forgotten that in the day in which we live. Strange. And even to mention it is to have it said of you, you’re a legalist. You’re a legalist. Even to mention it, you’re a legalist. We don’t mind names, so we’ll go on and teach what Paul taught.

Now there’s a great delusion, and anybody’s likely to fall into it, and it is the delusion that you can separate the foundation from the building, the root from the tree, that you can have the one and not the other. One reason why fundamentalism has fallen on hard times in our day, and thousands and multiplied thousands of believers who are true believers are turning away from the Word itself.

It’s not as many of the brethren say that they’re turning away from Christ. They’re turning away from foundations without buildings. They’re turning away from roots without trees. They’re turning away from theology without morality. They’re turning away from right beliefs without right living. And I am turning with them if I must, for I believe that we’re to have a foundation as well as if we’re to have a building we’re to have a foundation. But if we have a foundation, we’re to have a building.

Now, how completely foolish to separate the root from the tree or the tree from the root. Would you consider what value a root is buried deep in the earth if it has no tree and no fruit on the tree? Would you consider how vain it would be to have a tree without a root, just as you can’t have a tree without a root, so you can’t have or shouldn’t expect to have a root without a tree? The two go together. And think about how foolish it is to lay a foundation.

Imagine, if you will, laying a foundation, digging down with a bulldozer, getting rid of all the dirt down there, shoveling it away, then laying the footings in and building the foundation up, and then letting it lie there for a hundred years. What good is a foundation? It’s to lay a building upon. What good is theology unless it eventuates in right living? What good is right doctrine unless it means morality and sound truth and sound living?

So, we try to build a building without a foundation. That’s what our liberalistic friends do. They want to live right, and yet they don’t have any foundation for their buildings. So, they push the building up and keep it inflated with wind. And the result is talk, talk, but there’s no foundation.

But we, on the other hand, tend to lay foundations everywhere and not have any buildings. But Paul said, Titus, see to it that you get both. See to it that your people are well taught in sound theology but see to it that they understand that theology without conduct is vanity.

Charles G. Finney, to my mind, the greatest evangelist that ever lived, greatest evangelist that ever lived, and that’s including Paul. Greater than Paul as an evangelist, not as great as Paul as a theologian, not as great as Paul as an apostle, not as great as Paul in receiving the inspired Scriptures, not great in that way, but greater than Paul in the one job God gave him to do, evangelism.

He taught and taught boldly that to teach Bible classes without making an application was to grieve the Holy Ghost and tempt God. And he said it’s all a mistake to have classes where you teach doctrine, unless when you’ve taught your doctrine, you make the application and say to the people, now, as a result of believing this truth, how are you going to live? Bring your life into conformity with it. Right belief without right living has very little value, very little value. And how are you going to have right living if you don’t have right belief?

Now, Christ gave us a powerful illustration, and I will talk about that a little bit and close. Christ gave us a powerful illustration. I want you to notice. In Matthew, the seventh chapter, and it’s in perfect harmony with Paul here. Our dispensationalizing brethren take in Titus but dismiss Matthew. And here yet we have it on the same thing, the same spirit, the same principle, same beliefs, here in the seventh of Matthew as we have in Titus, the book of Titus.

Jesus said, Therefore, whosoever heareth these sayings of Mine, and doeth them. You see, hearing these sayings of Mine, that’s theology. Doing them, that’s morality. Hearing these sayings of Mine, that’s the foundation. And doing them, that’s the building. Hearing these sayings of Mine, and doing them, that’s having the tree and the root, or the root and the tree.

And our Lord never separated the two. He expected and meant that the two should go together. I believe that we could have some kind of revival in our land, some kind of a reformation that would last.

Perhaps it wouldn’t be so dramatic, but it would last. If every preacher started and for three months insisted that everybody obey what he preached and insists upon it that the Word was given that it might get obedience, and that the foundations were laid they might have buildings, and that the root was there that it might produce the tree and its fruit. But Jesus said, whoever hears and does these, I will liken him unto a wise man.

Here was Jesus with His great oriental love for parables and illustrations. He said, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock. And naturally, the rain didn’t come, nor the floods didn’t descend, just to be a part of this story. But rains descend, and floods come, winds blow, normally. Normally.

In a little country paper that I used to know, there was a character by the name of Peter Tumbledown, and he kept a very bad farm, and he never fixed the roof. And he gave as his reason for not fixing the roof, that when it was raining, he couldn’t, and when it wasn’t raining, he didn’t need it.

Now, when you build a building, you don’t use Peter Tumbledown’s theology. You build it in good weather, with the knowledge that the good weather won’t last. When you build in July, you build with the knowledge there will be a December and a February. You build with not a breath of air and the sun shining calmly on the meadows, with the knowledge the time will be when the wind may hit 50 miles an hour, and the rain come down in drenching torrents.

And our Lord said, this man built his house on a rock, and he did it by doing. He used exactly the illustration I’ve used before. He heard and did, and the result was that his house was on the rock. When the floods came, and the rain descended, and the winds blew and beat upon that house, it wasn’t there they weren’t mad at the house particularly. They were just being the way winds and floods and rain are. But that house had to stand up there. But it fell not, says Jesus, for it was founded upon a rock.

But he said over against this, everyone that hear these sayings of Mine, there’s theology, and doeth them not, there’s failure to have living in harmony with our teaching. He shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon a rock.

And while I have not used this before, in my sermons on divine wisdom, do you notice here how Christ contrasted between the wise man and the fool? There we have moral wisdom, which is as practical as a slide rule. Moral wisdom, when it builds a house, digs down to the rock and lays a heavy good foundation.

Moral foolishness, when it builds a house, builds on sand. And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the wind blew. The rains and the floods and the wind weren’t mad at the house. It was just, they do those things, that’s weather, and you can expect that. And the beat upon that house, and it fell, and great was the fall of it.

The house was just as, I suppose, as carefully built as the other one, except that the foundation was neglected. The man had the theology, but he didn’t have the light. Somebody says, well, but you’re confusing your illustration, maybe so, but I’m getting an idea across, am I not, that there must be practical soundness, the hearing and the doing.

There you have the two of them, the hearing and the doing. They’re a unit, you can’t separate them. And if you separate them, you have no foundation. It goes out from under you, and even your very beliefs cease to have any value to you.  And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house, and it fell, and great was the fall of it.

Everybody that heard that understood it. Everybody knew about that, everybody. I’ve heard of houses that were built, and built in filled-in sections, or sections that were so sandy, that they hadn’t been built long until great cracks began to appear in the bricks. Plaster began to crack. The foundations were poor. They might have meant well, but the foundations were bad. So, my brethren, a foundation and the building they’re one, and so Paul says, speak thou the things that become sound doctrine.

All right, Paul, what do you believe? You believe in the Trinity? Yes, but I’m not talking about that. You believe in the deity of Jesus? Yes, but I’m not talking about that. You believe in baptism by immersion? Well, of course, we’ll have to have Paul say yes, even though some people wouldn’t say he said yes, but we have a baptistry back here, so we’ll say he said yes.

And Paul, what else do you believe in? Do you want us to teach second coming? That’s not what I’m talking about. What do you want us to teach? I want you to teach it all, but what I’m specially asking you to bear down on here in Crete is the things that befit sound doctrine.

Old Haldeman-Julius was an atheist. There’s reason to believe he finally died by his own hand. When I was a boy, this atheist was publishing books called the Little Blue Books, and I got hold of them and began to learn about the great writers, and what little education I got, I got partly out of an atheist who was a great publisher of great books and published them all, good and bad and indifferent.

I believe I knew the difference between them. But anyway, this atheist wrote a sketch one time about religion. He didn’t believe in it. He said he could drive through the landscape and enjoy the scenery without leaning on the God that was supposed to have made the scenery. But when he came to a chapter in his book about the Quakers, he said this significant thing. He said, then came the Quakers and startled the Christian world by living like Christians.

Imagine that. Startled the Christian world by living like Christians. I believe that without any particularly great leaders maybe, but just the common people, the plain Christians, I believe that we could startle the religious world if we’d begin to take seriously Paul’s admonition to live lives that befit sound doctrine.

Not only believe what the Bible says but do what the Bible says. Not only believe the theology but practice the morality of the Bible. Quit our lying. Quit our deceiving. Quit our gorging. Quit our luxurious spending. Quit our quarreling. Quit our nasty treatment of each other. Quit our laziness. Quit our long, unnecessary, and expensive vacations away from God’s house.

I believe in the vacation, all right, even if I don’t take them, but they run to extremes. In England they say when Friday comes, cars are bumper to bumper for the seashore, and they don’t come back till late Sunday night, and the churches are left high and dry for the owls and the janitor. That’s carrying a decent thing to terrible extremes. They can import Billy Graham or any other great preacher they want to. They’ll never have lasting revival until they’ve started obeying God.

Paul Rees, they say, I always claimed one of America’s greatest preachers, in going to England, said in his church in Minneapolis, that if the English people don’t remember that you can’t bring the blessing of God by bringing a good man to your shores. Speak the things which befit sound doctrine, that aged men live this way, aged women live this way, young men live this way, young women live this way. Employers do this, and employees do that, and all of you do this. That’s the way Paul said sound doctrine ought to sound. And I believe that we could startle the world, rock the liberals back on their heels.

A man wrote me a letter and said, you probably won’t like it that you get a fan letter from a liberal. But he said, I just read something you wrote, and I like it. And I wrote back and said, listen, there are two kinds of liberals. There are the smooth talking, hollow fellows with superficial philosophies who don’t mean what they say and live on wind and words. And I have no respect for them.

But there’s another kind of liberal, the kind that’s been driven to liberalism by the hollow lives of the orthodox and the poor living of those who claim to be fundamental in their faith. And I said, I not only respect them, I pity them, and I think you’re among them. Instead of damning the liberal, we ought to remember the liberal hasn’t had a very good example of godliness.

If we lived the way Paul taught us here, I think the liberals would begin to disappear. One after the other, they’d begin to disappear. Captain Henning, how many of you know Cap Henning? He is connected with the Pacific Garden Mission, and has been a Christian for years. When Mrs. Dietz died, we had her funeral here in this church. Cap Henning sent a floral piece. There was a long ribbon and in gold letters, the florist had written this, I watched her life and sought her Savior.

And I saw Cap Henning and ate with him the other day. And Henning said, I was a fresh, smart, young fellow and I stayed at the Dietz home, and I watched Mrs. Dietz. He said, when I was leaving, they said, would you like to pray with us, Cap? And he said, sure. And he got down on his knees and got converted. I watched her live and then I sought her Savior. But there’s many a liberal today that watches us live and turns to liberalism. Not because he’s got anything against Christ, but because he gags on what he sees.

If the holy season, as we call it, means anything, my friends, it means that we ought to take this whole thing practically. If that was God’s Son that rode into Jerusalem there that Palm Sunday, if that was God’s Son who came out of that new tomb on that Sunday morning and stood among men in shining glory, that’s all true and I stake my eternal future on it.

Then we ought to begin to live as if it was true and stop being animals, civilized animals, living according to our glands, chitchat and gossip and all the rest. We ought to begin to live like Christians.

And if we do, immediately our prayers will take on a new power. Immediately our testimony will take on a new sharp edge. Immediately our joy will begin to spring up like wells in the desert. And I believe that we can make an impression on mankind.

Some of my poor orthodox brethren have begun to believe over the last years that if we can get some good polemical writers, that is argumentative writers, who know how to argue with others, and we get some good books arguing for the faith that we can cure liberalism, never, my brethren, you will cure it when we begin to live like Christians, but never before. So, I beg of you, let’s begin to live the life that befits sound doctrine.

Categories
Messages

Tozer Talks

Holding Fast to Sound Doctrine

Holding Fast to Sound Doctrine

Author and Pastor A.W. Tozer

March 16, 1958

The book of Titus, the first chapter. The book of Titus. Word by word almost, we’re going over this book. Verse seven, the bishop must be so on. Verse nine, holding fast the faithful word as ye hath been taught, that he may be able by sound doctrine, convince, to exhort, and to convince against errors. For there are many unholy and vain talkers and deceivers, especially they of the circumcision, whose mouths must be stopped; who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre’s sake. One of themselves, even a prophet of their own said, the Cretians, Cretians it is here. Cretan, it is in almost every other version and in the dictionary, so chances are, that I will be seeing Cretan, though Cretian it is in this particular version. The Cretians are always liars, evil beasts, slow bellies. This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply that they may be sound in the faith.

Now in about three or four sentences, I want to relate today’s talk to those which have preceded it. Paul says by the Spirit that bishops, presbyters, that means teachers. And I would assume it includes pastors and others who try to expound the Scripture. That among other qualifications, they must hold fast to the faithful word. They must have ability in sound doctrine, for the dual work of teaching the teachable and silencing the gainsayers. Now, that relates what I am to say from here on, to what I’ve said before, and what Paul wrote, for after all, that’s what I’m trying to do, to make what I’m saying hug very, very tightly to what Paul said before.

Now, we have the expression, there are many unruly. And I honestly am sorry that I have to deal with this, with these words, unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, because I don’t like to. I’d much rather talk over on the happy side of things. But in a world of sin and the devil, a world that is all out of moral focus, where the church is like a flock of sheep in the wilderness surrounded by a wolf even where the wolves put on the garment of dead sheep, and come and run with the flock. And the poor sheep don’t recognize it.

Well, you’ve got to deal with things as they are. Wouldn’t it be comfortable if we never had to deal with ill health? In a world like this, if nobody ever had to pick up the newspaper and read so and so is in the hospital? Wouldn’t it be a comfortable world if nobody ever got sick, if there was no enemy called sickness? Wouldn’t it be comfortable if there was no such thing as known as an accident, if we never picked up a newspaper and read so and so was killed in an accident on the highway or in the factory or on the farm? Wouldn’t it be a comfortable world if we never saw in the newspaper, so and so was held up last week and robbed of $3,000, he was beaten over the head by the gunman, no crime anywhere? Just a world without crime, without accidents, without ill health, without death. It would be a comfortable world, nice place to stay.

And wouldn’t it be ideal if there were no unruly persons? No vain talkers and deceivers anywhere, but the truth just grew without cultivation. No weeds to cut down, no hard ground to break up with a hoe? But we just taught the Word and everybody smiled and received it and began to obey it. Nobody came rushing in upset about what had been done? It would be a comfortable, beautiful world. But you know, that’s not the way it is. And maturity requires that we deal with things as they are, not as we wish they were.

There is a kind of religion of Christianity, a form of it, a weakened, watered form of it, that honestly and I think well-meaning the people are, they try to make Christianity to be just that. They look at the world with one eye, the good eye. They see the sunset, but they never see the storm. They hear the birds sing, but they never see the vultures. They see the roses, but their blind eye will not look at the thorns. They hear the happy laughter, but they will not hear the moans. They see the joyous Christian, but they will not acknowledge the presence of the unruly, the deceiver, and the vain talker. Now, that is spiritual immaturity.

If I were in serious trouble, and I were wanting to send, if I actually got where I had to have prayer help from somebody, I wouldn’t send for a man who had a reputation of never facing reality. I couldn’t because I would be calling a spiritual boy into my presence. I would be calling an immature child into my presence. I wouldn’t want to send for too happy a man if I were in serious difficulty with my family or myself. And if I wanted somebody to consult with and to pray with me, I wouldn’t send for a man if he’s too happy. Because in a world like this, if you’re too happy, you’re immature, because an immature man sees with only one eye. He sees all the happy things, but he doesn’t see the other side. He won’t face it.

Paul wrote from the prison and said, rejoice and again I will say, rejoice. But in the next breath, he said, I write unto you even weeping. And he said, sorrowful, yet always rejoicing. He was a mature man, he saw both sides. And I would want a man who had within him a spiritual buoyancy that came from the engrossment with a resurrected Christ, I would want to come to pray with me if I were in trouble. A man whose heart was buoyant with the inward lift of the life of God, but whose heart was also heavy with the griefs of the world, then, I would have a mature Christian. So, I can’t skip this, unruly and vain talkers. I can’t skip this, it’s here, and maturity requires that we deal with it.

Now, the unruly. Dean Spence of Gloucester, a famous old Bible expositor said this, this unruly person, He said, nominally he’s in the congregation of Christians, but in reality, refusing all obedience, acting for himself, factious and insubordinate. That was the definition of the Dean of Gloucester put on this word, unruly. In the congregation of Christians normally, but in reality, back of the nominal, which is in name, the real have these four counts against him: refusing all obedience, acting for himself, factious and insubordinate.

Now, such as this is self will of course, headstrong and defiant. You know it just occurs to me, that I’ve stopped being defiant. I think there was a time when I was pretty defiant. I know as a boy I always was defiant, and I didn’t care how big the fellow was. I defied him even though I was scared stiff. I defied him. And when I got converted, I carried that spirit of defiance over into the church. And a lot that used to pass for courage, was just defiance. But I find that that’s gone out of me. I don’t defy anybody.

I got a letter from a man, a young man who said he was an undergraduate in a certain college. He said he hesitated to criticize me but felt he had to. Then he wrote me a lone letter taking me apart. And he said, I defy you. Well, it struck me, it had been a long time since I use that expression, I defy you. While the Scripture says that even Michael the Archangel, when disputing with the devil about the body of Moses, didn’t dare say I defy you. He said the Lord rebuke thee.

The defiant man imagines he’s strong, but he’s not, he’s just carnal. And he will allow himself to go on in that way, defiant, headstrong, and self-willed. He’s hurting only himself. Then, such of course scorns the spirit of the flock. We’re members of the flock, and there’s a spirit in the flock. And the unruly defies that spirit, scorns it and refuses the voice of the Shepherd and the under shepherd and set their personal opinion against the pastor and all the godly Christians, and the whole church.

Now, this is the state of heart that brought about the fall of Satan. Satan defied God Almighty, and he defied rules and laws and all the rest. It’s also the state of heart that brought about the fall of Adam. Adam was obviously defiant. And it was the state of heart that brought and kept Israel in constant turmoil into, and kept in constant turmoil. Always backsliding and getting restored again and tearfully bruised and beaten and then repent and be restored, and then get defiant and headstrong and go down again.

The whole history of Israel was like that. And it’s a tragic thing, that even when Messiah came, they defied Him and said, we won’t have this man to rule over us. And what was supposed to be strong, manly courage, was satanic defiance. And their rejection and dispersion throughout the whole world, the ghastly pogroms and and ghettos and gas chambers and massacres and assassinations that have occurred all down the years have been the result of this rejection. And this defiance on the part of Israel caused them to crucify Christ. Well, we all measure ourselves and see that’s all, whether we are in this class or not. Certainly, there are not many here, if any, but if there should be any who measure, I’m talking about this unwillingly. I wish I could skip it. But as a mature teacher of the word, I dare not, for everywhere, these are, just as everywhere there’s sickness.

Now, we come to the vain talkers and deceivers. They’re the restless, uneasy spirits who quote Scripture for their purpose. But they’re empty talkers. And Paul says about them, whose mouths must be stopped. Now, why not let them alone. Those who believe in the letting alone process quote the passage that says let the weeds and the wheat grow together until the harvest. But what they overlook is, that the weeds and the good grain grow together in the field and the field is the world. But he never said let the weeds grow in the church. He said, let the sheep and the wolves live in the world. But he didn’t say let the wolves live in the sheep fold. There’s a difference there. We’ve got to watch it.

But he says if you try to weed out by too strict preaching, if you try to weed out any of the vain, unruly persons and vain-talkers, you’re likely to root out some of the good plants along with them. Let the two grow together until the harvest. Yes, grow together in the world, but not grow together in the church. Paul said, whose mouths must be stopped. Why? Because they subvert whole houses. Now, the word subvert means to overthrow by undermining the morals of and destroying the allegiance or faith of, undermining the morals or destroying the allegiance or the faith. He says the reason these unruly vain-talkers have to be silenced is that they subvert whole houses.

Now let’s talk a little bit about this subverting whole houses. You know what Paul means here is, whole churches. Because you see, in the day of Paul, they hadn’t begun to build church houses yet. And they only met in synagogues, or preached in synagogues, and they met in people’s houses, in upper rooms, wherever they could meet. They hadn’t any church buildings yet. So they met in the houses of the people.

You remember in Acts 12, when James had been slain with a sword, and they took Peter intending to bring him forth and slay him, but it says . . . I remember Dr. Torrey divided that up for preaching like this. But prayer was made, continually of the church, unto God, for him. Isn’t that an outline for a sermon? Prayer was made continually, of the church, unto God, for him. The result was, God sent an angel and turned Peter loose, took him out and set him free. And Peter lit out immediately. Where do you suppose he lit up for? To find the church of course. He knew that they were praying for him where the church met. And that particular church met in the house of Mark, his mother, Mary, the mother of Mark whose surname was John. So, there was a house.

Now, that was a church meeting in the house. And that’s what it meant when Paul says, to the saints in thy house I send my greetings. That’s what he meant when he said, he preached the gospel publicly and from house to house, as we might say, on the street and from church to church.

So, the word “house” is used to mean the church. You see, we’ve got it backwards now. We use the word church to mean the building. And we use the word that belongs to the people and attach it to the building. They use the word that belonged to the building and attached it to the church. But nobody got mad. The Lord didn’t send judgment. There are Christians now, who if we say this is a church here, why, they fly white with shock. They say, don’t you realize that the church is the Body of Christ, and this building is just a building? Why sure we realize that. But brethren, we have one thing that governs us. We make words our servants. We never let words become our masters.

And when I say, the third Presbyterian Church or the First Baptist Church, everybody knows I don’t mean the building. Everybody knows what I mean. And if I’m referring to the building, everybody knows I’m referring to the building. So nobody has ever yet been deceived by our use of the word church to mean a building. It’s an extension of a word. You will say, a motion was made from the floor that such and such be done. Well, what did they mean by that? Why, they mean the people standing on the floor or sitting on chairs from the floor of the House made a motion. They don’t mean the floor made the motion.

When we say that there will be a meeting of the board, we don’t mean there’ll be four pine boards meet in the pastor study. They used to sit around a board, and so the word was extended from the board where they met, to the people that met around the board. It’s the same with a House of Representatives. When it says it has not yet been passed by the House, we don’t mean the building there in Washington, we mean the several hundred men who sit in that House. So let’s not get enslaved to words.

When it says the church which is in thy house. Why, he was explaining when he says, the saints in thy house. And he says, you preach the gospel from house to house. They met in houses and they extended the word to cover the people that met in that house, and we do the same thing. We’ve reversed it and we say church, meaning the the building sometimes. So, the church can mean, according to our English, either the building or the people. And nobody’s ever deceived. But there are semantic slaves who insist upon being accurate in everything, so accurate, that it’s a pain to be around.

Well, now what are you going to do with the unruly, the vain talkers and the deceivers? How can we deactivate them? Is that the word they used to take the trigger out of a bomb so it is harmless? I remember when one of the huge atom or hydrogen bombs didn’t go off. They had to send some fellows up there to pull the stinger out of it. And I’ll tell you, I shook for those fellows for a couple of days until I found they got their job done. Can you imagine going up a high tower to pull the stinger out of an atom bomb. And if you made a little mistake, you’d be instantly atomized, literally atomized. I am not fooling, I mean that. They would be literally made into atoms. You’d never know what has happened. Talk about the cool nerves of a man like that. I would have lost fourteen pounds in perspiration just walking from the building to the tower. But those calm, cool fellows went up there and did it. They pulled the stinger and came back down smiling and said it done.

Well, how do you deactivate these unruly people and vain-talkers and deceivers and make them harmless? Well, the Scripture says you do it by setting forth the Faithful Word and by sound doctrine, convincing and exhorting, so that all the efforts to subvert is harmless. The only perfect defense against error is truth. And the only defense against the big lies is the big truth. Always remember that.

I got a letter from a man in Brazil in reading the Alliance Weekly. He said I fled from Germany under Hitler and from somewhere else under Stalin. And he said I don’t want you ever to write anything with politics in it. I’ve had enough. Well, poor fellow, I don’t blame him, the fellow that had to fly from a devil and a bear and a tiger. I understand that. I think I know what he means. But I will venture to step aside long enough to say this, that if we plain Americans were sufficiently convinced of the soundness of our position, we wouldn’t have anything at all to worry about from the subverters from Moscow. But because a lot of Americans aren’t convinced, they tremble before the impact of the big lie. But do you know how to meet the big lie, with the big truth?

And it’s the same in the church of Christ. You meet the big lie with a big truth, and the only defense against the deceiver is the Spirit of truth. For Paul said, you Christians there in Crete, you look out. And you teachers, you’ve been sound in the faith and careful, hold the Faithful Word because remember Cretians are always liars. That’s a proverb down the years, lie like a Cretian they say. Thomas Hardy has that in one of his books, lie like a Cretian. Well, they said Cretians are always liars. If somebody says, and then he adds, of course the rather awkward expression, always liars, evil beasts, slow bellies, lazy people. But somebody says, don’t you think that was a sweeping generalization?

That’s what I get criticized for so much they say, “but you make sweeping generalizations.” Well, Paul made a sweeping generalization here for a man. He hadn’t studied logic I suppose, so he said, Cretians are always liars, evil beasts, slow bellies. Paul, is it possible that you can indict a whole nation? Yes, it is possible. For don’t you know that there have been great cities that have gone completely rotten. Look at Sodom and Gomorrah. They had gotten so completely rotten that only half a dozen people got out. Is it possible to corrupt a whole population? Look at the flood. They had become so completely corrupt morally, that the only thing God could do with them was to drown them all except eight people that he picked out who had yet a bit of decency left in them.

And it’s possible if you have read the history of England about the time of the Wesleys. You won’t believe what you read. You won’t believe it. The complete corruption of moral standards. At that time, the Wesley’s came forth and began to preach, and historians said saved England from a revolution. There would have been a revolution grown up out of that rot, except they repented. And they did repent under the Wesleys.

When I was a kid, I used to, long toward the Spring, go into apple barrels or apple boxes. We didn’t have refrigeration, so we had to do what we could do to keep our fruit overwinter. And sometimes, a box of apples would rot. And it would rot so completely that if you just stick your hand into it up to there. And boys don’t mind that, so I used to do it and feel around and I’d feel one hard apple and take that out, wash it off. And you can believe this or not. There would be one apple completely sound, not even smell of the rot after it was washed, because there wasn’t a single break in the skin anywhere. It was sound all over and in the midst of that rot, there was one or two maybe, or half a dozen sound apples. I’ve seen that.

So, in a city like Sodom, there were eight people, or a few people, and by the time of the flood, they were eight. And the time Christ came to Israel, there were a few. And in England, there were Susanna, Wesley and Samuel and their family and a few others. So, it’s possible for a whole population to rot. It’s possible for us to learn from each other, accept each other standards, and rot a whole population. That’s why I stand and condemn the beer songs and the cigarette songs. And that’s why I condemn the glorification of evil men and women who happen to look good. They’re made the heroes and heroines of our youth. The result is, we rot a whole generation. It’s possible to do that. They did it in Crete. Somebody did it. And so, in Crete there was a population morally so rotten that the only thing to do with them was to turn on them and rebuke them soundly.

Now, when Christianity is taken into a country where there are low moral standards and corruption abroad, the temptation is, when they get converted, to bring their moral standards over into the church. In some places they stand for that and defend it. Certain missionaries say, not of our society, they say they preach the gospel to an old tribal chief with nine wives. They say, we don’t interfere with his cultural standards. That’s nine wives, that’s part of his culture. Concubinage belongs to his culture. Therefore, we’re not going to to interfere with his culture. We’re just preaching Christ to him. That wasn’t Paul’s idea. In Japan, some of them say, we know that our Japanese Christians bow to the Shinto shrines, but it’s purely their culture. We can’t interfere with their culture. Paul did. Paul said, Christianity comes with two things, sound doctrine and sound morals, and I don’t believe you’re sound until you have both. Therefore, rebuke them sharply. There’s only one standard for Christianity, whether it’s in the Baliem Valley or in Boston. There is only one standard, whether it’s in cultured, sophisticated England or over in Russia. Only one standard, the standard of Christ. We won’t bother customs. If they wear their hair long, we let them wear it long. They wear it short, let them wear it short. Whatever kind of clothes they wear, we won’t bother that. There are various mores as they call it. Don’t bother those. It is none of our business. But when it comes to moral questions, we do bother them. Because if we don’t, we’re not preaching the Word and we’re not carrying out the commission for which we send out our missionaries and preachers.

Cretians are always liars and slow bellies and evil beasts he said, and when they get converted and come into the church, they come in carrying a lot of that with them. He said, rebuke them soundly and sharply, and teach them and exhort them so they give up all that.

Well, when Paul said sound in faith, always remember this, all men orthodox in belief and pure in conduct. That was orthodoxy in Paul’s concept. Orthodox in belief and pure in conduct, and the one springs out of the other, and you can’t separate the two. And if you only hold an orthodox creed that does not result in a purity of conduct, then your creed isn’t orthodox.

So, the ideal is and with this I close. The ideal is not to accept arbitrary moral standards. You shall eat this. You shan’t eat this. You shall wear this. You shan’t wear this. Those are arbitrary and they are things that perish where they use it. You shall do this this day. You shall not do it that day, perish with the using. Paul said, don’t accept those. Read, the second of Colossians. Don’t let anybody, anybody put down on you any arbitrary rules at all, but stay by what the Bible says. Let no man judge you in meat or drink or in respect of a holy day or the new moon or the Sabbath which are but a shadow of things to come, for the body is of Christ. Let no man beguile you of your reward and voluntary humility and worshipping of angels intruding into those things which they have not seen, vainly puffed up by their fleshly mind. They’re not holding the Head, Jesus Christ, from whom all the body by joints and bands of nourishment minister and knit. Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the rudiments of the world, why, as though living in the world are ye subject to ordinances? We don’t allow anybody to screw down on our Christianity any rules of conduct that aren’t in the book. The ideal is to accept no arbitrary moral standards, but let the truth purify us.

Now, you are clean through the word which I’ve spoken unto you. Christ is the truth and Christ is holiness incarnate. And we are under obligation to be a disciple of His in belief and practice, and then worship in spirit and in truth. That’s the ideal. So, Paul said, that’s the thing to do. Rebuke them sharply that they may be sound in the faith and sound in the faith Paul meant, sound in their beliefs and sound in their conduct. That’s wonderful to me.

Right in the middle of a rotten city like Chicago, God can feel around and find some apples that are just as shiny and red-cheeked and sound, all by the wonderful, wonderful keeping power of God. All by the wonderful keeping power of God, we drive their streets, we ride their buses, we work for them, we buy from them, we sell to them. We keep their books. We drive their trucks. We live in the world and Paul said, you can’t escape that. But all the time we’re with them, we’re like a sound apple in the midst of a rotten barrel. We can be kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation ready to be revealed in the last time and never even smell of the world around about us. That’s wonderful, isn’t it? And within the church of Christ there should be no rot. The church of Christ should be a place where every apple is sound and every Christian is pure. And if they’re not Paul said, sharply rebuke them and tell them they’ve got to be sound in their faith and practice if they are going to be Christians. Amen. All right.